HERMANN-GUNDERT-GESELLSCHAFT
Hermann Gundert Society
Society for the Promotion of Inter-Cultural Dialogue eV
Stuttgart, Germany
IMPRINT
Hermann Gundert Society
Society for the maintenance of intercultural dialogue eV Stuttgart
Gebelsbergstrasse 17
D 70199 Stuttgart
Email: info@gundert.org
Website: www.gundert.org
1st chairman: Christoph A. Frenz
2nd chair: Melanie Schrag
Treasurer: Johanna Pick
Images:
Rainer Schoder
Jayantha Gomez
Ulrike Hartwein
Internet:
Ulrike Hartwein
Register court: Stuttgart
Register number: VR 5308
For the sake of readability, the masculine form of expression is used on this website. However, it also means the feminine or neutral address.
Despite careful content control, we assume no liability for the content of external links. The operators of the linked pages are solely responsible for their content.
The content, documents and photos published on this website are protected by copyright and may also include the rights of third parties. Use is subject to applicable copyrights.
LEGAL NOTICE
Liability notice: Despite careful control of the content, we assume no liability for the content of external links. The operators of the linked pages are solely responsible for their content.
No warning without previous contact!
Should any content or the technical design of individual pages or parts of this online portal violate third-party rights or legal provisions or otherwise cause competition law problems in any form, we ask for an appropriate, sufficiently explanatory and quick message, referring to Section 8 (4) UWG without cost note.
We guarantee that the rightly objected passages or parts of this website will be removed within a reasonable period of time or that the legal requirements will be extensively adapted without the need for legal assistance on your part.
Involving a lawyer to issue a warning, which is subject to a fee for the service provider, does not correspond to the service provider's real or presumed will and would thus constitute a violation of Section 13 (5) UWG, due to the pursuit of irrelevant goals as the dominant motive for initiating proceedings, in particular an intention to achieve costs as the actual driving force as well as a violation represent against the duty to mitigate damage.